A2 English Language
Investigating Language on Twitter
Introduction:
· I have chosen to focus on language and power and
how this has been affected by modern technology.
·
Hypothesis – People with political power use a
higher level of formality when using Twitter
·
In order to conduct this investigation we will
specifically look at the use of textisms, grammar, and punctuation.
Methodology:
· We chose to compare the tweets of a person with
political power and a person with influential power we therefore chose Ed
Milliband and Fearne Cotton à
they are both powerful people that are constantly in the public eye. They are
also of similar age and are both British, this makes them comparable.
·
In order to avoid bias we chose a systematic way
of sampling; we went to each person’s Twitter profile and picked every 5th
tweet.
·
Using the tweets that we picked we counted
different formality features; use of non-standard English, multimodality, use
of first person pronoun, emotive language.
Analysis:
Feature
|
Ed Milliband
|
Fearne Cotton
|
Non-standard English
|
|
IIIII IIIII II
|
Multimodality
|
I
|
II
|
1st Person
|
IIIII
|
IIIII IIII
|
Emotive Language
|
IIIII IIIII II
|
IIIII II
|
·
Fearne is more informal à uses 12 x more non standard
English than Ed Milliband, this could be attributed to the fact that because
she holds no political power she doesn’t feel like she has to be formal
·
Ed uses more emotive languageà almost twice as much
more than Fearne, this could be because he is using emotive language as a way
of persuading people
·
Fearne Cotton uses more multimodality with her
tweets ( pictures, emojis, links etc.) this could be considered less formal as
it is behaviour associated with those of the younger generation
·
Fearne uses more 1st person pronoun,
this is exclusive language.
Evaluation and
Conclusion:
·
Data supported the hypothesis, therefore we can
accept it. Those who have Political Power use a higher level of formality than
those who have influential power.
·
The investigation was successful however very
limited; in order to improve the investigation we could have increased the
number of tweets analysed to make the data more reliable.
·
Although we tried to make the two people
comparable other factors could have also influenced the formality of the
language used. In order to make the data more reliable we needed to use more
control variables; e.g. same sex, same age, same upbringing/ background etc.
This is to make sure that the only thing that would affect their language is
their position of power.
Good - please read the comments on Natalya's post. Also, consider which aspects you investigated to test formality - why emotive and 1st person? Would having more subjects help reliability? You could potentially quantify the results of more subjects but just focus the investigation in context on the two main participants, using the quantified data to explore how reliable your findings are.
ReplyDelete