Thursday, 23 April 2015

Grouping Texts Task


Texts A, C, D, G and F all contain imperatives; texts C, D, F are forms of advertisement and therefore have the primary purpose of to persuade.  Text F could be considered a weak inclusion because unlike the others it uses cloak imperatives.

Text A is a collection of transcripts of some messages left on an answer phone because of this the messages have a low level of formality. From message 1 we can assume that the caller and the receiver are very good friends as they are talking about meeting later up that night for a drink. The caller is confirming their plans and is apologizing as they will be late, they end the message with ‘’get the drinks in while ya waiting. Byeeee.’’ The replacement of the pronoun ‘’you’’ to ‘’ya’’ could be due to the sociolect of the person; however by using the informal version it shows that the caller have a good relationship, this is due to the fact that the caller didn’t feel the need to use the correct pronoun when leaving the message. Their good relationship could also be why the caller felt it was acceptable to give the imperative ‘’get the drinks in.’’ The sentence is very informal which can be seen through the use of the verb ‘’get’’ and the adverb ‘’in.’’ From the rest of the message we can assume that the main purpose of the imperative isn’t for it to be followed, the receiver could be using it as another means of apologizing for the fact that they will be late; they are trying to make up for this by re-assuring the receiver that there is no need to wait for them and to have fun without them.  Similarly to Text A, the imperatives in Text G don’t have a primary purpose of to be followed. Text G is a copy of card found inside a pack of high quality tights. In order to carry on the image of quality, the card contains information about the tights as well as instructions on how to fit them. The first step on the card ‘’ from a sitting position gently gather the tights with your hands and ease over each foot.’’ The use of the adverb ‘’gently’’ carries on the theme of luxury and might make the consumer feel that their tights are delicate and should be handled with care, the verb ‘’ease’’ also carries the same connotations. The rest of the card contains the rest of the instructions and uses soft verbs that put forward the image of high quality and luxury. Most women know how to fit tights properly, which is why we can assume that the main purpose of the instructions aren’t to instruct but are there in order to make the consumer feel like they have bought into ‘’a new concept of hosiery.’’ The instructions are there to inform the customer that the company’s tights are different and therefore should be treated differently to other tights. Texts C, D, F could be a sub group due to the fact they are different forms of adverts that use imperatives.  Text C is the back of CD cover, and therefore has the primary purpose of persuading the audience to buy the CD they do this through the use of imperatives. They try to convince the audience by listing the different occasions the CD could be used for ‘’ play it while you travel by train, stash it in your tent, or keep it cranked up while you’re tooling down the A303…’’ The imperatives show that the CD has many different uses and suggest that you will be able to get your money’s worth out of it. The use of informal language such as the dynamic verbs ‘’cranked’’ ‘’tooling’’ ‘’stash’’ show that the main target audience of the CD are males and females of the young generation who would be attracted to the following list.  Text D is a poster advert for a phone company and uses two imperatives; ‘’Prove it. Phone her while the football’s still on.’’ From the imperatives we can assume that the advert might targeted at males, due to the football reference. The slogan of the company is ‘’bringing people together,’’ this helps us understand the advert better, they are telling the target audience to prove their love to their girlfriend by phoning them when the football is still on. The use of the contraction of ‘’football’s’’ makes the imperative shorter and therefore more effective. The short direct imperatives might also be appealing to the target audience as maybe they won’t like adverts that are too consuming to read.  Text F could be seen as a weak inclusion as it uses cloaked imperatives, however it belongs to the same sub group as C and D as it has the primary purpose of persuasion.  The advert is for a charity, which could be a reason as to why it doesn’t use direct imperatives. The advert asks for volunteers or donations ‘’ if not we really need your money.’’  The intensifier ‘’really’’ shows the audience that the charity desperately requires donations. This could make the audience feel sympathy towards the company because they are working hard to help other people but still require help themselves. The cloaked imperative works more effectively than a direct imperative would have been, this is because the charity is asking for money but is offering nothing in return. People would already be reluctant to part with their money, they if are being directly told to do so they might even be more reluctant. However by hiding behind the cloaked imperative the company is able to make the audience feel sympathy and therefore help them achieve their primary purpose.

Sunday, 19 April 2015

A short extract from a romantic novel

She re-adjusted her bag, and stepped onto the train carriage. As she did so, a strong hand enclosed her delicate wrist pulling her back. Unwillingly she turned around, already knowing who she was going to face. Being on the train meant that she was just about the same height as him, his dark eyes stared knowingly into hers. She tried to stare defiantly back, but she felt a tear roll down her cheek and she was furious at herself for letting him see how much he had hurt her.

‘’I am so sorry B. Really really sorry’’ he apologized in his deep voice

She shook her head in response and tried to release her hands but his only just tightened in return.

‘’It was a drunken mistake, the stupidest fucking mistake I’ve ever made, you've got to believe me! She meant nothing to me. God B. you have to forgive me, just say you’ll forgive me! ’’

The tears flowed freely down her face; he used his free hand to wipe them away. At his touch, her resolve crumbled and she pressed her face into his hands.

‘’I trusted you Cal, everyone told me to stay away, but I trusted you’’

Calum hated the sadness and hurt in her voice, and hated the fact that it was him who had caused that. She looked so small, her narrow shoulders hunched over in defeat. He let go of her wrists and enveloped her in a hug, trying to convey all the regret he felt in the simple gesture.Brooke breathed in his familiar scent, and pressed her face closer into his chest. Calum was still wearing a suit, which meant that he had probably just returned from work when he found the note Brooke had left. The note was an act of weakness on her part, but she knew that if she gave him a chance to explain she would be persuaded into forgiving him. That was the thing with Calum; he was handsome, charismatic, smart. And he knew it too. It was a deadly combination, and she should have known better but his smile was so dazzling and just like every other girl she fell for it. Because that's what she was, a silly girl who had the misfortune to fall in love with her boss.  

Saturday, 11 April 2015

3 Language and Gender Theories

·       
  •   Dominance Theory-   this is a claim that states that in a dialogue between a man and a woman, the man is more likely to interrupt.  This theory arose from a study carried out by Don Zimmerman and Candace West in which they observed 31 conversations between men and women. Their report showed that 11/31 conversations show men interrupting a total of 46 times whilst women only interrupted during 2/31 conversations. However some people argue (Geoffrey Bettie) interruptions doesn’t have to necessarily mean an assertion of dominance but could be seen as a sign of interest and involvement.

·      
  •   Deborah Tannen and difference- Professor Tannen summarised in an article related to her book ‘’You Just Don’t Understand’’ the six main differences in men and women’s language:

1)      Status vs. Support - For men conversation is seen as a competition and a way to assert their dominance to prevent others from asserting theirs. Women on the other hand conversation is a way to gain approval and support for their ideas.  The world to man is seen as a way of gaining status, whilst women see it as ‘’a network of connections seeking support and consensus.’’ 
2)      Independence vs. Intimacy - Professor Tannen states that women usually think in terms of in closeness and support, whilst men are more concerned with independence and their status. An example that Tannen gives on this is that a woman would ask her husband if they could have a guest over because she likes telling her friends that she has to check with her husband. The man on the other hand would invite the guest without checking with his wife because to do so would mean losing his status.
3)      Advices vs. Understanding - Men often see complaints as challenge and will strive to find a solution but in this scenario all a woman wants is sympathy.
4)      Information vs. Feelings - Men are more concerned with obtaining and giving information whilst women are more likely to talk about emotions.
5)      Orders vs. Proposal - Women tend to use cloaked imperatives, or use indirect imperatives e.g.  ‘’lets’’ ‘’why don’t we?’’ Men on the other hand prefer to hear/ give direct imperatives.
6)      Conflict vs. Compromise- men are more likely to argue and resist things vocally whilst women often concede but complain or try and find a middle ground. 

  • Robin Lakoff- during 1975 published ‘Language and a Woman’s Place’ which contains an account of women’s language. In another similar article she wrote assumptions about what marks a woman’s language from a man’s, some of these claims are:

o   Hedge -  women use phrases such as ‘’sort of’’ ‘’kind of’’ ‘’it seems like’’
o   Use super polite forms - ‘’would you mind’’ ‘’I’d appreciate it if’’
o   Use tag questions – ‘’you’re going to dinner aren’t you?’’
o   Avoid coarse language or expletives
o   Use empty adjective e.g. divine, lovely, adorable, cute
o   Use more intensifiers e.g. ‘’so’’ ‘’very’’
o   Use cloaked imperatives – ‘’it’s a bit cold in here isn’t it? ‘’ 


Source: http://www.universalteacher.org.uk/lang/gend